Yes, defining checkers within other entities is like having nested modules or nested interfaces. I assume that normally checkers will be declared in the compilation unit scope. Thanks, Dmitry ________________________________ From: Bresticker, Shalom Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2007 8:29 AM To: Seligman, Erik; Lisa Piper; Korchemny, Dmitry; Thomas.Thatcher@sun.com Cc: sv-ac@server.eda-stds.org Subject: RE: [sv-ac] 1900 Checkers So it would be like a nested module or a nested interface? Shalom ________________________________ From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Seligman, Erik Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2007 4:39 AM To: Lisa Piper; Korchemny, Dmitry; Thomas.Thatcher@sun.com Cc: sv-ac@server.eda-stds.org Subject: RE: [sv-ac] 1900 Checkers Lisa-the intention was not that checkers have to be defined in a module. They may be declared within a module, or outside a module. In an OVL-like library, the checkers would be defined as standalone objects. Dmitry-maybe we should state this more explicitly? ________________________________ I could use some more up front information on the use model. I thought this was to be similar to OVL but get around the issues that result from having it conform to a module definition. But if it has to be defined in a module, then how is it used as a general library element? If I define the checker in module a, then how do I reference it from module b? I feel like I'm missing something important. lisa -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is believed to be clean. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sun Sep 23 10:34:46 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Sep 23 2007 - 10:35:03 PDT