Doron-- Do we explicitly describe 'implies' and 'iff' anywhere? If I'm reading right, we have added formal defs to the grammar & tables, but not a plain english description of what these things mean. I don't think "not all derived forms are described explicitly in section 16" is sufficient justification for omitting this. While the meaning may be obvious to sv-ac members, I think general LRM readers will want some explicit description, a short paragraph like we have for conjunctions, if-else, etc. ________________________________ From: Bustan, Doron Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2007 8:45 AM To: Korchemny, Dmitry; Seligman, Erik; sv-ac@eda-stds.org Subject: RE: [sv-ac] {Filename?} imply and iff operators I upload new versions where I changed 'imply" to "implies" and fix some of the numbering. Doron ________________________________ From: Korchemny, Dmitry Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2007 5:33 PM To: Bustan, Doron; Seligman, Erik Subject: RE: [sv-ac] {Filename?} imply and iff operators Hi Doron, I think that the operator name should be implies, and not imply. Thanks, Dmitry ________________________________ From: Bustan, Doron Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2007 9:32 AM To: Seligman, Erik Cc: Korchemny, Dmitry Subject: RE: [sv-ac] {Filename?} imply and iff operators As far as I understand not all derived forms are described explicitly in section 16. I will go over the numbers again. Doron ________________________________ From: Seligman, Erik Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 8:32 PM To: Bustan, Doron Cc: Korchemny, Dmitry Subject: RE: [sv-ac] {Filename?} imply and iff operators Hi Doron-- Shouldn't these new operators have paragraphs defining them, somewhere in sections 16.12.*? I see them added to the grammar, but not described. (BTW-- the section numbering in the doc seems off, sometimes 16.12.* and sometimes 16.2.*. You should probably fix that too while you're touching it.) ________________________________ From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Bustan, Doron Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 12:43 AM To: sv-ac@server.eda-stds.org Subject: RE: [sv-ac] {Filename?} imply and iff operators Hope this file will have a better luck. Doron ________________________________ From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Bustan, Doron Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 10:19 AM To: sv-ac@server.eda-stds.org Subject: [sv-ac] {Filename?} imply and iff operators I have modify the 1932 proposal to define the "imply" and "iff" property operations. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Sep 20 08:21:40 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 20 2007 - 08:21:46 PDT