FW: [sv-ac] call to vote on 1728

Sending it again as it did not go earlier.

Manisha

-----Original Message-----
From: Kulshrestha, Manisha 
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 5:09 PM
To: sv-ac@server.eda-stds.org
Subject: RE: [sv-ac] call to vote on 1728

Hi,

I vote no on the proposal.

I noticed few corrections required in the proposal:

1. On page 3, In the footnote for let_instance (40) it says:
"let_instance may be used only in the expressions which are part of
sequence or property expressions, let declarations or immediate
assertions." Whereas on the same page later it says: "A let declaration
may be instantiated in other let declarations, sequences, properties,
concurrent and immediate assertions."

In the note (40), concurrent assertions are missing. 
On page (4) again it says "A let declaration may be instantiated in
expressions of immediate assertions and match items of sequences,
properties, verification statements, and other let declarations." This
statement is again inconsistent with other such statements. What is the
intended usage in match items ? Will it be used on the right hand side
of assignment or it can also be used in arguments of the subroutine
calls ?

2. The proposal does not say that let instance can be used in expect
statement (expect statement is not included in concurrent assertions).
Is that intended ? I think expect should be included in here.

I am still looking at the proposal and send more feedback if I find any
more issues.

Thanks.
Manisha

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On
Behalf Of John Havlicek
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 11:05 PM
To: sv-ac@server.eda-stds.org
Subject: [sv-ac] call to vote on 1728

Hi Folks:

This is the call to vote on the proposal for Mantis 1728.

The document is 

  LetConstruct1728\ 070911_dk.pdf

on Mantis.

Please vote if you are eligible.  See the details below.

J.H.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
------

Ballot on Mantis 1728 

- Called on 2007-09-12, final ballots due at 2007-09-19 T 23:59-07:00
(PDT).

 v[xxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xx] Doron Bustan (Intel)
 v[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-x] Eduard Cerny (Synopsys)     
 n[-------x-xxx---------x-x-xxx-x---x] Surrendra Dudani (Synopsys)
 v[-xxxxxxxxx-xx-xxxxx-xxx-xxx-------] Yaniv Fais (Freescale)
 t[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] John Havlicek (Freescale - Chair)
 v[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxrxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxx] Dmitry Korchemny (Intel -
Co-Chair)
 v[-xxx-x--xx--xxxxx----------xx-xxxx] Manisha Kulshrestha (Mentor
Graphics)
 n[---------------xxxxx-------x-xx-x-] Jiang Long (Mentor Graphics)
 n[-------x--xxx.....................] Joseph Lu (Altera)
 v[xxxx..............................] Johan Martensson (Jasper)
 n[------------x--x-xx--xx-xxxxxxx-x-] Hillel Miller (Freescale)
 v[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx] Lisa Piper (Cadence)
 v[xxxxxx-x-xxxxx-x..................] Erik Seligman (Intel)
 n[--------xxxx-----xxxx-xx----------] Tej Singh (Mentor Graphics)
 v[--xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Bassam Tabbara (Synopsys)
 v[xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxx...............] Tom Thatcher (Sun Microsystems)
   |---------------------------------- attendance on 2007-09-11
 |------------------------------------ voting eligibility for this
ballot
|------------------------------------- email ballots received


	Legend:
		x = attended
		- = missed
		r = represented
		. = not yet a member
		v = valid voter (2 out of last 3 or 3/4 overall)
		n = not valid voter
                t = chair eligible to vote only to make or break a tie

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.