RE: [sv-ac] 1601 and 1549

Yes I agree.  Thanks. I corrected that when I sent them to John. I think
John is doing some fine tuning.

 

lisa

 

________________________________

From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com] 
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 2:44 PM
To: Lisa Piper; john.havlicek@freescale.com
Cc: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: RE: [sv-ac] 1601 and 1549

 

Lisa, the second file looks misleadingly named. "1601_then_1549" gives
the impression that 1601 precedes 1549.

 

Shalom

 

	 

	
________________________________


	From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org
[mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Lisa Piper
	Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 1:24 AM
	To: john.havlicek@freescale.com
	Cc: sv-ac@server.eda-stds.org
	Subject: [sv-ac] 1601 and 1549

	Hi John,

	I have attached the re-worked proposals to assume 1549 goes
first, then 1601.   I did not put them on Mantis yet. I will wait for
instruction on this.  

	Lisa <<1549_new_types_before_1601.pdf>> <<1601_then_1549.pdf>> 

	
	-- 
	This message has been scanned for viruses and 
	dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/>
, and is 
	believed to be clean. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
 
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.