Hello Everyone, Travel could be an issue for me. I just need to submit the travel justification. Tom Seligman, Erik wrote On 09/07/07 07:16 AM,: > Austin should work for me. Dmitry, I assume from your distance, Austin > is just as good as SC. > > How about the rest of you? I haven't seen many replies to yesterday's > email. If we want this to happen we should get things moving. The more > of us that can attend in person, the more effective it will be. > > (BTW-- John-- is someone investigating the reflector problems?) > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Havlicek [mailto:john.havlicek@freescale.com] > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 6:46 AM > To: Seligman, Erik > Cc: john.havlicek@freescale.com; sv-ac@eda-stds.org; Bustan, Doron; > eduard.cerny@synopsys.com; yaniv.fais@freescale.com; Korchemny, Dmitry; > Manisha_Kulshrestha@mentor.com; johan.martensson@jasper-da.com; > piper@cadence.com; bassam.tabbara@synopsys.com; thomas.thatcher@sun.com; > R53776@freescale.com > Subject: Re: Proposal: 2-day "Mantis Marathon" face-to-face > > Hi Erik: > > After having slept on this, I woke up thinking it is a good idea to try > to make a face-to-face work. > > However, I will not be able to attend in person unless the meeting is in > Austin. So I am interested to hear whether people can attend a meeting > in Austin near the transition from September to October. > > Wherever the meeting is held, there should be accommodation of remote > participants, at least through a conference call. Possibly some > web-based multimedia sharing could be done. > > There will need to be a quorum of participants in order to vote on > proposals. If a quorum of participants cannot be raised, then the > meeting could still serve to accelerate revision and convergence on > proposals. > > J.H. > > >>X-ExtLoop1: 1 >>X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.20,215,1186383600"; >> d="scan'208";a="273229504" >>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 >>Content-class: urn:content-classes:message >>Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 07:13:51 -0700 >>X-MS-Has-Attach: >>X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: >>Thread-Topic: Proposal: 2-day "Mantis Marathon" face-to-face >>thread-index: AcfwfPnmBYODijRsSWW2z1ZGejg4HgAEdnQg >>X-Priority: 1 >>Importance: high >>X-Message-Flag: Follow up >>From: "Seligman, Erik" <erik.seligman@intel.com> >>Cc: "Bustan, Doron" <doron.bustan@intel.com>, > > <eduard.cerny@synopsys.com>, > >> <yaniv.fais@freescale.com>, >> "Korchemny, Dmitry" <dmitry.korchemny@intel.com>, >> <Manisha_Kulshrestha@mentor.com>, > > <johan.martensson@jasper-da.com>, > >> <piper@cadence.com>, <bassam.tabbara@synopsys.com>, >> <thomas.thatcher@sun.com> >>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Sep 2007 14:13:52.0260 (UTC) >>FILETIME=[26F07C40:01C7F090] >> >>=20 >> >>Hi all-- >> >>Dmitry & I were chatting, and we are both worried about getting all >>the current proposals into the standard in our time frame, given the >>long SVAC-Champions-SVAC revision loop, the upcoming Jewish holidays >>affecting various committee members, and the fact that we barely get >>through half our agenda in most meetings. >> >>One idea used by some of the other committees has been to hold a 2-day > > >>face-to-face session. We would all be sitting in a single conference >>room, looking at the same proposals on the screen, and we could try to > > >>complete edits & approve by voice vote as many items as possible. >> >>Dmitry is willing to travel all the way from Israel for this, so the >>rest of us wimps have no excuse for refusing! >> >>Ideally, it would be best if this happens before the 10/4 IEEE > > meeting. > >>But it probably needs to happen after the holidays. Some possible >>dates Dmitry & I have discussed are 9/26-9/27, or 10/2-10/3. >>Location-wise, I was thinking the Bay area (Santa Clara/San Jose) >>might be easiest for a bunch of us to get to, though I don't have a >>good sense of our geo distribution. >> >>John, does this sound doable? What do the rest of you think? -- ------------------ Thomas J. Thatcher Sun Microsystems 408-616-5589 ------------------ -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Sep 7 18:39:05 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Sep 07 2007 - 18:39:27 PDT