[sv-ac] RE: next[0] as clock alignment

From: Bustan, Doron <doron.bustan_at_.....>
Date: Tue Sep 04 2007 - 04:40:48 PDT
I changed it to start from next[1]=next, so the next[0] is preserved for
future use.

Doron

-----Original Message-----
From: John Havlicek [mailto:john.havlicek@freescale.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 2:39 PM
To: Bustan, Doron; Korchemny, Dmitry
Cc: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: next[0] as clock alignment

Hi Doron, Dmitry:

I sent a comment yesterday about not wasting the next[0] syntax
on a no-op and that it makes sense for this to mean clock alignment.

Dana Fisman has a technical report that discusses this topic:

http://www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il/~dana/publicatclcks_fix.pdf


J.H.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue Sep 4 04:41:27 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 04 2007 - 04:41:34 PDT