RE: [sv-ac] next[0] as clock alignment

I think that should be 
http://www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il/~dana/publicat/clocks_fix.pdf .

Shalom 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org 
> [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of John Havlicek
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 2:39 PM
> To: Bustan, Doron; Korchemny, Dmitry
> Cc: sv-ac@server.eda-stds.org
> Subject: [sv-ac] next[0] as clock alignment
> 
> Hi Doron, Dmitry:
> 
> I sent a comment yesterday about not wasting the next[0] 
> syntax on a no-op and that it makes sense for this to mean 
> clock alignment.
> 
> Dana Fisman has a technical report that discusses this topic:
> 
> http://www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il/~dana/publicatclcks_fix.pdf
> 
> 
> J.H.
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous 
> content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.