Re: [sv-ac] Feedback on 1900 (new 'checker' construct)

From: Brad Pierce <Brad.Pierce_at_.....>
Date: Tue Jul 24 2007 - 14:40:36 PDT
>However, any construct within a checker should be defined as
non-synthesizable,
>and won't result in extra hardware in the design.

I don't think it's appropriate for this language standard to say
anything about what may or may not be synthesized.

Also, why wouldn't users want synthesized checkers in their
FPGA-accelerated test benches? 

[In reply to http://www.eda-stds.org/sv-ac/hm/4363.html .]

-- Brad


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue Jul 24 14:40:53 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jul 24 2007 - 14:41:02 PDT