In that case yes, it can be easily changed. ed > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On > Behalf Of Brad Pierce > Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 5:36 PM > To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org > Subject: RE: [sv-ac] P1800 - constant primary as delay in ## > : Mantis 1901 > > The cycle_delay production that is used in > procedural_timing_control and > clocking_drive is independent of the cycle_delay_range production used > in sequence_expr. > > -- Brad > > -----Original Message----- > From: Eduard Cerny [mailto:edcerny@synopsys.COM] > Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 2:07 PM > To: Brad Pierce; sv-ac@eda-stds.org > Subject: RE: [sv-ac] P1800 - constant primary as delay in ## : Mantis > 1901 > > Brad, > > I think that ## can also be a cycle delay in procedural code and there > it is not restricted to a constant primary. This is why I did > not change > the syntax but added a constraint. Is that a good reason or I missed > something? > > Thanks, > > ed > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of > > Brad Pierce > > Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 4:36 PM > > To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org > > Subject: Re: [sv-ac] P1800 - constant primary as delay in ## > > : Mantis 1901 > > > > Ed, > > > > Why not just allow any constant_primary after ##? > > > > Then the rule for cycle_delay_range could be simplified to > > > > cycle_delay_range ::= > > ## constant_primary > > | ## [ cycle_delay_const_range_expression ] > > > > plus a footnote that in a cycle_delay_range it shall be > illegal for a > > constant_primary not to evaluate to a nonnegative integer? > > > > Recall that > > > > constant_primary ::= ( constant_mintypmax_expression ) > > ::= ( constant_expression ) > > > > -- Brad > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of > > Eduard Cerny > > Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 11:31 AM > > To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org > > Subject: [sv-ac] P1800 - constant primary as delay in ## : > Mantis 1901 > > > > Hi, > > > > I have created a new mantis entry, 1901, and also attached > a proposal. > > > > Best regards, > > ed > > > > -- > > This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by > > MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. > > > > > > -- > > This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by > > MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. > > > > > > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Jun 26 18:11:01 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jun 26 2007 - 18:11:34 PDT