[sv-ac] notes on 1681

From: John Havlicek <john.havlicek_at_.....>
Date: Tue Jun 26 2007 - 08:33:36 PDT
All:

We said in our last meeting that 1682 looks ready for vote, but 
this proposal depends critically on 1681.  I think we need to 
pass 1681 first.

I read over 1681 and noticed a couple of things that I think need
to be addressed.  Please see the notes below.

J.H.

2007-06-26
----------

p. 1.  The reference to Annex E needs to be changed to Annex F.

p. 4.  The examples with the ## delays are not clear to me.  I'm not
  sure they were entirely clear before with the "using default
  clocking" comment, but now that this explanation has been struck out
  I am sure that they are not clear.  I think there needs to be some
  explanation, perhaps following the examples, that says how the
  clocking events are determined.  Maybe a different scheme of
  examples is needed.

p. 5.  In the suggested replacement text, there is something missing.
  The new paragraph begins

     is controlled by $global_clock

p. 5.  The reference to Annex E needs to be changed to Annex F.

p. 5.  Are the phrases "primary system clock" and "primary phase" defined?

p. 6.  In the proposed addition to 16.13.2, is the scope of the requirement 
  of alignment to the global clock limited to the clocking events appearing
  in property expressions?  I suppose that it applies transitively into 
  instances of named sequences and properties.  Does it apply to clocking
  events in action blocks or in sequence match items?

pp. 10-11.  I'm sure you know that the rightarrows (long mapsto) are
  missing in the clock rewrite rules.  It would be good to fix this to
  avoid confusion.


  

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue Jun 26 08:33:56 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jun 26 2007 - 08:34:04 PDT