Yes I agree. Yaniv John Havlicek wrote: > Hi Ed: > > I agree with you on this. > > Yaniv: > > Do you see Ed's point? This change is in the context of a > discussion of default clocking. In various places in the > LRM, the syntax boxes omit parts of the grammar productions > that are not relevant for the discussion at hand. For > this change, adding the ellipsis "..." after default > clocking shows that there is something in the production > that follows but that has been omitted. > > J.H. > > >> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 >> Content-class: urn:content-classes:message >> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 09:31:57 -0700 >> Thread-Topic: [sv-ac] reminder of e-mail ballot on 1648 >> Thread-Index: AcexqOEa/QlOlm69TiyILTX/aE/WSQAHQbZA >> From: "Eduard Cerny" <Eduard.Cerny@synopsys.com> >> Cc: <sv-ac@eda-stds.org> >> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Jun 2007 16:31:58.0870 (UTC) FILETIME=[3118D360:01C7B1C6] >> >> The ... after default clocking ... meant to indicate that there is more >> to follow. Since the syntax box is only talking about default clocking, >> I did not think appropriate to add the default disable sinnce all the >> other items were also skipped (the ... before default clocking.) >> >> ed >> =20 >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On=20 >>> Behalf Of Fais Yaniv >>> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 9:01 AM >>> To: john.havlicek@freescale.com >>> Cc: sv-ac@eda-stds.org >>> Subject: Re: [sv-ac] reminder of e-mail ballot on 1648 >>> =20 >>> =20 >>> I vote yes on 1648 except for a minor fix on top of page 3 of=20 >>> the proposal, >>> =20 >>> original text: >>> =20 >>> /module_or_generate_item_declaration ::=3D // from A.1.4 >>> ... >>> | default clocking clocking_identifier ; >>> .../ >>> =20 >>> =20 >>> I think it should be: >>> =20 >>> / >>> module_or_generate_item_declaration ::=3D // from A.1.4 >>> ... >>> | default clocking clocking_identifier ; >>> _| default disable expression_or_dist ;_ >>> .../ >>> =20 >>> =20 >>> Yaniv >>> =20 >>> =20 >>> =20 >>> John Havlicek wrote: >>> >>>> All: >>>> >>>> This is a reminder that we have an e-mail ballot ongoing=20 >>>> for Mantis 1648. The ballot closes at the end of the day, >>>> PDT, tomorrow, 2007-06-19. >>>> >>>> Please vote if you are eligible and have not already done so. >>>> >>>> Below are the results so far. >>>> >>>> J.H. >>>> >>>> =20 >>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>>> Ballot on Mantis 1648 >>>> >>>> - Called on 2007-06-12, final ballots due by 23:59 PDT on=20 >>>> >>> 2007-06-19. >>> >>>> v[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xx] Doron Bustan (Freescale) >>>> yv[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-x] Eduard Cerny (Synopsys)=09 >>>> v[xxx---------x-x-xxx-x---x] Surrendra Dudani (Synopsys) >>>> v[x-xx-xxxxx-xxx-xxx-------] Yaniv Fais (Freescale) >>>> t[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] John Havlicek (Freescale - Chair) >>>> v[xxxxxxxrxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxx] Dmitry Korchemny (Intel - Co-Chair) >>>> n[x--xxxxx----------xx-xxxx] Manisha Kulshrestha (Mentor Graphics) >>>> n[------xxxxx-------x-xx-x-] Jiang Long (Mentor Graphics) >>>> v[-xxx.....................] Joseph Lu (Altera) >>>> n[---x--x-xx--xx-xxxxxxx-x-] Hillel Miller (Freescale) >>>> v[xxxxxx-xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx] Lisa Piper (Cadence) >>>> yv[xxxxx-x..................] Erik Seligman (Intel) >>>> v[xxx-----xxxx-xx----------] Tej Singh (Mentor Graphics) >>>> yv[x-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Bassam Tabbara (Synopsys) >>>> yv[xxxxxxxxxx...............] Tom Thatcher (Sun Microsystems) >>>> |------------------------ attendance on 2007-05-29 >>>> |-------------------------- voting eligibility for this ballot >>>> |--------------------------- email ballots received >>>> >>>> >>>> Legend: >>>> x =3D attended >>>> - =3D missed >>>> r =3D represented >>>> . =3D not yet a member >>>> v =3D valid voter (2 out of last 3) >>>> n =3D not valid voter >>>> t =3D chair eligible to vote only to make or=20 >>>> >>> break a tie >>> >>>> =20 >>>> >>> =20 >>> --=20 >>> This message has been scanned for viruses and >>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >>> believed to be clean. >>> =20 >>> =20 >>> > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Jun 19 00:52:56 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jun 19 2007 - 00:53:06 PDT