RE: [sv-ac] Mantis 1757 Accepton / rejecton operators

Hello,

Brad, thanks. I have done the corrections and also changed the names to
accept_on and reject_on, which I also like better (and some old version
of the text was like that). If not acceptable I can easily change it
back.

Please find attached the modified proposal, also it is uploaded.

Best regards,
ed
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On 
> Behalf Of Brad Pierce
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 3:45 PM
> To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-ac] Mantis 1757 Accepton / rejecton operators
> 
> The new keywords need to be added to Annex B. 
> 
> Also, the words 'accepton' and 'rejecton' sound like nouns, similar to
> 'electron' or 'prion'.  (And 'rejecton' looks like a misspelling of
> 'rejection', too.)  Maybe they should instead be 'accept_on' and
> 'reject_on', similar to 'join_any' any 'join_none'.
> 
> In "Otherwise, he overall", the 'he' should be 'the'.
> 
> In "The operators accepton and rejecton may be used inside a recursive
> property. For example, the following uses of accepton and rejecton
> property are legal" the occurrences of 'accepton' and 
> 'rejecton' should
> be in a bold monospaced font.
> 
> -- Brad
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> Eduard Cerny
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 11:19 AM
> To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
> Subject: [sv-ac] Mantis 1757 Accepton / rejecton operators
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I have uploaded an updated version of the proposal, also 
> attached here.
> 
> best regards,
> ed
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
> MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 
> 
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.