RE: [sv-ac] LRM Draft 3 review: Clause 16

> The vertical lines of the syntax boxes don't show

Stu removed the vertical lines.

-- Brad

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Thomas Thatcher
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 10:08 AM
To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: [sv-ac] LRM Draft 3 review: Clause 16

Hi John,

I have reviewed clause 16 of the Draft 3 LRM.  I looked at Draft 1 and
Draft 3 side-by-side to check for any questionable changes to the text,
and clicked on every cross reference to ensure they all were correct.

Most of the things I found were formatting differencess.  Here is a
list.

1.  p. 342, subclause 16.9:  In item D, there is a paragraph with
changed
    formatting.  The second through last lines of the paragraph were
    significantly indented from the first line.  It looks like this:

	Paragraph text paragraph text paragraph text paragraph text
paragraph
			text paragraph text paragraph text.

2.  p. 346, subclause 16.12:  Paragraphs in items B, C, D, E have the
same
    formatting problems, as described above.
3.  p 353,  subclause 16.12.4:  Paragraphs in Restrictions 1, 2, & 3
have the
    same formatting problems.
4.  p 355		Another paragraph with same formatting problems.
5.  p 377, subclause 16.15.1:   Same paragraph formatting problem in
item a.

It appears that one paragraph style has changed, and it is causing all
these formatting differences.


Here are a few other strange formatting problems:  These may only be a
problem with my setup.  I am viewing these documents on a Solaris
machine with Acroread 7.0.1.  I have seen differences before between
different systems.

1.  The vertical lines of the syntax boxes don't show, even when I view
the
    document at 200% size.

Tom
--
------------------
Thomas J. Thatcher
Sun Microsystems
408-616-5589
------------------

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.