[sv-ac] LRM Draft 3 review: Clause 16

Hi John,

I have reviewed clause 16 of the Draft 3 LRM.  I looked at Draft 1 and Draft 3
side-by-side to check for any questionable changes to the text, and clicked on
every cross reference to ensure they all were correct.

Most of the things I found were formatting differencess.  Here is a list.

1.  p. 342, subclause 16.9:  In item D, there is a paragraph with changed
    formatting.  The second through last lines of the paragraph were
    significantly indented from the first line.  It looks like this:

	Paragraph text paragraph text paragraph text paragraph text paragraph
			text paragraph text paragraph text.

2.  p. 346, subclause 16.12:  Paragraphs in items B, C, D, E have the same
    formatting problems, as described above.
3.  p 353,  subclause 16.12.4:  Paragraphs in Restrictions 1, 2, & 3 have the
    same formatting problems.
4.  p 355		Another paragraph with same formatting problems.
5.  p 377, subclause 16.15.1:   Same paragraph formatting problem in item a.

It appears that one paragraph style has changed, and it is causing all these
formatting differences.


Here are a few other strange formatting problems:  These may only be a problem
with my setup.  I am viewing these documents on a Solaris machine with
Acroread 7.0.1.  I have seen differences before between different systems.

1.  The vertical lines of the syntax boxes don't show, even when I view the
    document at 200% size.

Tom
-- 
------------------
Thomas J. Thatcher
Sun Microsystems
408-616-5589
------------------

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.