RE: [sv-ac] call to vote on Mantis 1730

Hi John,

OK, I'll just change the numbers from 16 to 17 and remove some
deletions. 

ed 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Havlicek [mailto:john.havlicek@freescale.com] 
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 11:42 AM
> To: Eduard.Cerny@synopsys.COM
> Cc: Thomas.Thatcher@sun.com; john.havlicek@freescale.com; 
> sv-ac@eda-stds.org
> Subject: Re: [sv-ac] call to vote on Mantis 1730
> 
> Hi Ed:
> 
> Stu said that we are not supposed to be using draft2 as a 
> basis for Mantis proposals.  Draft2 is for proof of concept
> of feasibility of the merge.  It does not contain all the 
> changes in draft1.
> 
> J.H.
> 
> > X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
> > Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
> > Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 06:11:04 -0700
> > X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
> > Thread-Topic: [sv-ac] call to vote on Mantis 1730
> > Thread-Index: AceBTaUJ3BonPwwSSQuLdIk/dgXZzwHfxjug
> > From: "Eduard Cerny" <Eduard.Cerny@synopsys.com>
> > Cc: <sv-ac@eda-stds.org>
> > X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Apr 2007 13:11:06.0399 (UTC) 
> FILETIME=[83C8B2F0:01C788CD]
> > 
> > This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> > 
> > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C788CD.83720288
> > Content-Type: text/plain;
> > 	charset="us-ascii"
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > please find attached (and on Mantis) the proposal for 1730 with the
> > correction mentioned  by Tom. In addition I also corrected 
> Syntax box
> > 17-4, resp 16-4. I also changed it so as to refer to the 
> merged draft2
> > of p1800-2008, i.e., clauses 16-...
> > 
> > In that merged LRM, there are other errors not carried over from the
> > mantis prtoposals. For example, in the Syntax boxes 16-4 
> and 16-14, the
> > formal ports are stil tf_port_list, rather than the specific
> > non-terminals used in Annex A. =20
> > What should we do with that? Enter mantis items for it or 
> just report to
> > Stu?
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > ed
> > 
> > 
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.