I think that Draft 2 does contain all the Draft 1 changes, but it was as you say 'for proof of concept' only. Now that the WG has approved to continue the merge, Draft 3 (not 2) can be the starting point for further work. Shalom > Stu said that we are not supposed to be using draft2 as a > basis for Mantis proposals. Draft2 is for proof of concept > of feasibility of the merge. It does not contain all the > changes in draft1. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sun Apr 29 02:15:02 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Apr 29 2007 - 02:15:35 PDT