Re: [sv-ac] uploaded updated proposal for 1361

From: John Havlicek <john.havlicek_at_.....>
Date: Fri Mar 23 2007 - 06:46:48 PDT
Hi All:

I shouldn't have said anything about "poetic" -- I just 
tried to read the sentence and mentally pronounce the words,
and it sounded like a poem to me:

   On disable, enable, reset, and kill,
   Pass action, fail action and vacuous action callbacks,
   The returned p_vpi_attempt_info 
   Info pointer is NULL,
   And no attempt information is available.

If you don't find that at all funny, then please accept my
apologies.

J.H.


> X-Authentication-Warning: server.eda-stds.org: majordom set sender to owner-sv-ac@eda.org using -f
> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 07:26:51 -0500
> Cc: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
> From: John Havlicek <john.havlicek@freescale.com>
> Reply-To: john.havlicek@freescale.com
> X-eda.org-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
> X-Spam-Status: No, No
> Sender: owner-sv-ac@eda.org
> X-eda.org-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
> X-eda.org-MailScanner-From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Mar 2007 12:27:43.0770 (UTC) FILETIME=[A809C7A0:01C76D46]
> 
> Hi Manisha:
> 
> I noticed three minor things, listed below, that I would like tidied 
> up before we call for the vote and pass this over to SV-CC.
> 
> J.H.
> 
> - In several places, there are references to "22.19" that I think should be "22.9".
> 
> - In several places, there is text
> 
>      Refer to section 17.11.2 and 17.13 for the definition of vacuous success.
> 
>   In view of the changes from 1381 already in P1800-2008-draft1, I think this 
>   should be
> 
>      Refer to section 17.13.6 for the definition of vacuous success.
> 
> - I think the English structure of the sentence
> 
>      On disable, enable, reset, and kill, pass action, fail action and
>      vacuous action callbacks, the returned p_vpi_attempt_info info
>      pointer is NULL, and no attempt information is available.
> 
>    at the end is confusing (too poetic?).  Should there be an "and" before "kill"?
> 
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Fri Mar 23 06:47:10 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Mar 23 2007 - 06:47:14 PDT