Re: [sv-ac] review of mantis 1466

Hi Lisa:

I looked back over the proposal and noticed that in the
changes for E.2.3.3, there is no period after

   ( ##[+] R ) \equiv (##[1:$] R)

and there are two periods after

   ( ##[?] R ) \equiv (##[0:1] R)


Also, I think I have been dinged in the past for using the phrase
"Note that <blah blah blah>"  when <blah blah blah> is normative.
I guess this is not good LRM-ese.  You may want to change

   "Note that [*] is an equivalent representation of [*0:$] ..."

to something like

   "[*] is an equivalent representation of [*0:$] ..."


J.H.

> Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Mar 2007 19:41:41.0429 (UTC) FILETIME=[7525FE50:01C764DE]
> X-Received: By mx-sanjose2.Cadence.COM as l2CJfaRX022657 at Mon Mar 12 12:41:36 2007
> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:41:34 -0700
> X-MS-Has-Attach: 
> X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
> Thread-Topic: [sv-ac] review of mantis 1466
> Thread-Index: AcdbaQaZTZhWgKjWR/q1S+U98tnRfwJa6XLA
> From: "Lisa Piper" <piper@cadence.com>
> Cc: <sv-ac@eda-stds.org>
> 
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> 
> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C764DE.74E48880
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> 	charset="us-ascii"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
> Sorry for the delay.  I have updated the proposal as requested.=20
> 
> Lisa
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.