RE: [sv-ac] uploaded updated proposal for 1361

Hi Manisha,
 
Sorry to trouble you a bit, but 
a) can you change to "....as a result of control action"  to be
consistent with rest ? The rationale for this was/is that a VPI person
may not care about the system task rather focused on the VPI
inter-workings.
 
b) can you move up the " ..." to integrate within or at least right
after " 

- On disable, enable, reset, and kill, pass action, fail action, and
vacuous action callbacks, the returned p_vpi_attempt_info info pointer
is

NULL, and no attempt information is available."

 
Thx.
-Bassam.
 

________________________________

From: Kulshrestha, Manisha [mailto:Manisha_Kulshrestha@mentor.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 2:53 PM
To: Bassam Tabbara; sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: RE: [sv-ac] uploaded updated proposal for 1361


I have updated the cb... info. The updated document is on mantis and
attached here.
 
Thanks.
Manisha

________________________________

From: Bassam Tabbara [mailto:Bassam.Tabbara@synopsys.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 12:24 PM
To: Kulshrestha, Manisha; sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: RE: [sv-ac] uploaded updated proposal for 1361


Manisha, can you please add callbacks (cb....) for the control actions
as well ? Once this stabilizes we can split-off the VPI portion and send
to CC.
 
Thx.
-Bassam.
 

________________________________

From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Kulshrestha, Manisha
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 12:03 PM
To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: [sv-ac] uploaded updated proposal for 1361


Hi,
 
Please review and send comments.
 
Thanks.
Manisha

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is

believed to be clean. 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.