Re: [sv-ac] 1547 review

Hi Bassam:

I agree that we should not remove the capability to put
sequence/property declarations within a clocking block.

My point is that if there is no need to put sequence/property
declarations in a clocking block, then I can live with not
being able to put assertion directives in a clocking block.
I would just advise people not to put any assertion item in
a clocking block.

J.H.

> x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
> Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
> X-Former-Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:41:44 -0800
> Thread-Topic: [sv-ac] 1547 review
> Thread-Index: AcdV7CCwFFVEyTCMTI2btShcUa2wggAAvSwQAAAnnBAAACdRIA==
> From: "Bassam Tabbara" <Bassam.Tabbara@synopsys.com>
> Cc: <Bassam.tabbara@synopsys.com>, <piper@cadence.com>, <sv-ac@eda-stds.org>
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Feb 2007 19:41:44.0814 (UTC) FILETIME=[515140E0:01C755F0]
> 
> Hi Ed,
> 
> We shouldn't. I think the point is no need to put asserts in there as proposal.
> 
> THX. 
> -Bassam
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eduard Cerny <edcerny@synopsys.COM>
> To: Rich, Dave <Dave_Rich@mentor.com>; john.havlicek@freescale.com <john.havlicek@freescale.com>
> CC: Bassam.Tabbara@synopsys.COM <Bassam.Tabbara@synopsys.COM>; piper@cadence.com <piper@cadence.com>; sv-ac@eda-stds.org <sv-ac@eda-stds.org>
> Sent: Wed Feb 21 11:37:51 2007
> Subject: RE: [sv-ac] 1547 review
> 
> But the LRM already allows sequences and properties to be in cb. Can we
> remove them now?
> ed 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On 
> > Behalf Of Rich, Dave
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 2:34 PM
> > To: john.havlicek@freescale.com
> > Cc: Bassam.Tabbara@synopsys.COM; piper@cadence.com; sv-ac@eda-stds.org
> > Subject: RE: [sv-ac] 1547 review
> > 
> > > 
> > > It may be that there is no point in putting sequence or property
> > > declarations in a clocking block, in which case this proposal
> > > would be unnecessary.
> > > 
> > > J.H.
> > > 
> > [DR>] That was my point.
> > 
> > -- 
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean.
> > 
> > 
> > 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.