Re: [sv-ac] new mantis item and proposal #1641

Hi Ed:

Actually, I was referring to calling $error in the property.  See
my last post.

I have also wondered about severity tasks that are not called
directly in a match item or in an action block.  

I think the intention of the current 1641 proposal is that the 
action block rules apply only if the severity task is called 
directly from the action block.

I can imagine people wanting to call a user-defined error 
handling task that itself might sort out which severity 
task to call, and for that it seems it would be more useful
to have the action block rules apply than the sequential code 
rules.

J.H.

> Hi Manisha,
> 
> I think that John meant calling $error etc. from a task that is called
> from within a sequence.
> 
> ed=20