RE: [sv-ac] Definition of "levels" in $assertoff is missing

 There is no open item on this issue.
Surrendra

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of Stuart
Sutherland
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 2:56 PM
To: sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: [sv-ac] Definition of "levels" in $assertoff is missing


In Clause 29.2 of the SV ballot draft, $assertoff, $assertkill and $asserton
show the first argument as being "levels".  The meaning of this argument is
not defined in the LRM.

In SV 3.1a, the meaning of this argument was defined in section 11.8

Does the AC committee have an open action item on this?

Stu

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stuart Sutherland
stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
+1-503-692-0898