Dmitry and all, I have 3 items that I particularly would like to see in the next version of 1800; those items are mostly derived from what I see from users who post questions on verification newsgroups. These include: *1) 0003478: Make drivers of inout ports accessible* http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/view.php?id=3478 Taking account for external and internal drivers on inouts is important when verifying IPs (commercial or user defined) inserted into a higher level structure. *2) concurrent assertions in classes*. I understand that e allows such a thing, perhaps someone who knows e can expand on its usage. However, we can handle assertions in the following manner: a) assertions become active dynamically. b) tool will have to start collecting and reporting on concurrent assertions in a class when the class is instanced. c) tool will have to stop collecting and freeze the reporting on concurrent assertions in a class when the classes is nulled. d) A reference to a null object in an assertion would make that assertion vacuous. Below is an example of my thoughts. I forgot if we have a mantis on this, maybe we do. I am open to any suggestions. interface A_if (input logic clk); // .. clocking driver_cb @ (posedge clk); output rst_n, data_in, ld, kind_cp; input A; endclocking : driver_cb modport drvr_if_mp (clocking driver_cb); endinterface : A_if class A_driver extends uvm_driver #(A_xactn, A_xactn); string tID; virtual interface A_if.drvr_if_mp vif; rand bit[3:0] ct; bit a, b, c; function new(string name, uvm_component parent); //... endfunction : new `uvm_component_utils_begin(A_driver) `uvm_field_object(req, UVM_ALL_ON) `uvm_component_utils_end task get_and_drive(); ap_abc: assert property(@(this.vif.driver_cb) this.vif.A_cb.ld |=> a ##1 constraint <= 4'b1100); endclass : A_driver module forsv_ac; A_driver a_dvr1; // ... endmodule *3) Allow module (checker, etc) variables in ranges for assertions*. This is an often requested feature. Below is an example, and an equivalent implementation. Note that in that example, a tool can recreate an equivalent assertion with a property declaration. module forsv_ac; bit a, b, c, clk; int v; // ... ap_option1: assert property(@(posedge clk) a |=> ##v b); ap_option2: assert property(@(posedge clk) a |=> ##[v:v b); ap_variation1: assert property(@(posedge clk) a |=> ##[1:v] b); property p_variation1_equivalent; // Am producing an equivalent implementation int local_v=0; // this is an internal local variable defined by the tool a |=> (local_v <= v, local_v=local_v + 1'b1)[*0:$] ##1 b; endproperty ap_variation1_equivalent: assert property(@(posedge clk) p_variation1_equivalent); endmodule I'll make the meeting. We can discuss them whenever we feel it is necessary; however, I just wanted for now to document them. Ben Cohen On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Korchemny, Dmitry < dmitry.korchemny@intel.com> wrote: > Agenda: > ------- > - Reminder of IEEE patent policy. > See: *http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt* > <http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt> > - Elaborating recommendations for the next P1800 PAR. > - Opens > > > ......................................................................................................................................... > à *Join Lync Meeting* <https://meet.intel.com/dmitry.korchemny/722J99BN> > > > Join by phone > > US Toll free # 888-875-9370 > *+1(916)356-2663 (or your local bridge access #) Choose bridge 5.* > <+1(916)356-2663%20(or%20your%20local%20bridge%20access%20#)%20Choose%20bridge%205.> > (Global) English (United States) > *Find a local number* <https://dial.intel.com> > > Conference ID: 233905529 > > *Forgot your dial-in PIN?* <https://dial.intel.com> |*Help* > <http://o15.officeredir.microsoft.com/r/rlidLync15?clid=1033&p1=5&p2=2009> > > > [!OC([1033])!] > > ......................................................................................................................................... > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Intel Israel (74) Limited > > This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for > the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution > by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is > believed to be clean. > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Nov 6 08:57:31 2014
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Nov 06 2014 - 08:58:15 PST