Subject: Re: [sv-ac] the SV templates
From: John Havlicek (john.havlicek@motorola.com)
Date: Fri Nov 21 2003 - 13:30:46 PST
David:
I just noodled around with the template in frame and found that I don't
have "CourierNew" or "CourierNew Bold" fonts. Egad.
Do you have any advice on what to do in frame when a font is missing?
John H.
> From: "David W. Smith" <david.smith@synopsys.com>
> Cc: <sv-ac@eda.org>
> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:41:20 -0800
> X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
> Importance: Normal
> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by server.eda.org id hALIe0d8005886
> Sender: owner-sv-ac@eda.org
> Precedence: bulk
>
> Hi John,
> Yes, one of the assumptions is that I will be "cutting and pasting" the
> proposals into the rest of the changes for the LRM. Please take a look at
> www.eda.org/sv/LRMChanges_draft2.html or
> http://www.eda-twiki.org/sv/Changes_draft2/LRM_Changes_17.html for changes in the
> assertion section for examples.
>
> I appreciate the amount of effort you are going to have to go through. There
> are two kinds of changes that are being made in the 3.1a LRM. One is errata.
> This is, by far, the most time consuming for me since I have to make sure
> that the text in the 3.1 LRM and the change are clearly delineated. The best
> help you can provide here is to make sure that the original text is present
> and any changes to that text are marked (deletion and addition both).
>
> The other kind of change is the integration of new proposals. The primary
> effort here is in formatting the new proposals to match the current LRM:
>
> Times New Roman 10pt for all text
> Courier New 9pt for all examples and language syntax
> Bold on all keywords
> Format of section headers (Arial 11 for x.x level headers, Arial 10
> for x.x.x level headers)
>
> The templates on the sv web site actually contain the style sheets (frame
> and word) for all of the appropriate formatting. You have to open the style
> sheet to see the formats (which is also how you would apply the formats as
> well.
>
> Regards
> David
>
> David W. Smith
> Synopsys Scientist
>
> Synopsys, Inc.
> Synopsys Technology Park
> 2025 NW Cornelius Pass Road
> Hillsboro, OR 97124
>
> Voice: 503.547.6467
> Main: 503.547.6000
> FAX: 503.547.6906
> Email: david.smith@synopsys.com
> http://www.synopsys.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of John
> Havlicek
> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 8:38 AM
> To: surrendra.dudani@Synopsys.COM
> Cc: sv-ac@eda.org
> Subject: [sv-ac] the SV templates
>
>
> Surrendra:
>
> As far as I can see, the SV templates are free of
> content.
>
> I thought they were going to show me how the
> LRM change instructions should be formatted so
> as to limit the variation in the style.
>
> Now I am missing the point of why we are supposed
> to use these templates. Is the idea that someone
> is going to cut and past from them into the LRM
> document? If so, then I don't think I am competent
> to do this job, what with all the fonts and colors.
>
> Since preparing these proposal drafts is going
> to be virtually my entire weekend's entertainment,
> I'd like to stick to something I know how to do,
> like LaTeX.
>
> John H.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Nov 21 2003 - 13:31:46 PST