Re: [sv-ac] Draft 4 Review (resend with correction of one more numbering issue pointed by Scott)

[Shalom] I suggest you to open a separate Mantis item regarding your first
note. I think that it should be owned by SV-BC.
[Ben] Done http://eda-stds.org/svdb/view.php?id=4016

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Bresticker, Shalom <
shalom.bresticker@intel.com> wrote:

> Hi,****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> I captured your note about misplaced braces. What is wrong in your last
> comment about inconsistencies in Mantises 3113, 2093 and corrections in
> 1800’D4?****
>
> ** **
>
> [SB] There is no problem. Ben noticed that strictly speaking, the new
> draft LRM does not implement precisely what is specified in the Mantis
> item. However, as sometimes occurs, the editor understood the correct
> intent and implemented what was desired. So no changes are needed.****
>
> ** **
>
> I suggest you to open a separate Mantis item regarding your first note. I
> think that it should be owned by SV-BC.****
>
> ** **
>
> [SB] If the editor agrees, it is not necessary to open a new Mantis item.*
> ***
>
> ** **
>
> Shalom****
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.