Re: [sv-ac] Draft2 review

I reviewed 14, and all updates are OK
I reviewed Annex A.
  1 Correction needed:
-- A.4.1.4 Checker instantiation, The reference in the note is incorrect.
  It currently reads: D2, Mantis 2256
  it SHOULD read: *D2, Mantis 2556*
- A.9.3. The reference in the note is incorrect.
  It currently reads: D2, Mantis 2256
  it SHOULD read: *D2, Mantis 2556*
*
*
- In A.10 Footnotes (normative)
Item 13 should have a BAR to indicate a change (mantis 2901); should it be
in blue since it's also an addition?
Ben Cohen

On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Korchemny, Dmitry <
dmitry.korchemny@intel.com> wrote:

> Hi all,****
>
> ** **
>
> I reviewed subclauses 16.13.15 - 16.15.5 of the draft and found the
> following issues:****
>
> ** **
>
> In subclauses 16.9.11, 16.14.5, and 16.14.6 it is written:****
>
> ** **
>
> To detect the end point, the triggered method may be applied to a named
> sequence instance, with or without arguments, or a formal argument of
> sequence type, where such is allowed, as follows:****
>
> sequence_instance.triggered****
>
> formal_argument_sequence.triggered****
>
> ** **
>
> To detect the end point, the matched method may be applied to a named
> sequence instance, with or without arguments, or a formal argument of
> sequence type, where such is allowed, as follows:****
>
> sequence_instance.matched****
>
> formal_argument_sequence.matched****
>
> ** **
>
> These methods are invoked using the following syntax:****
>
> sequence_instance.sequence_method****
>
> formal_argument_sequence.sequence_method****
>
> ** **
>
> I think that in all these places it is better to add or between the syntax
> alternatives:****
>
> sequence_instance.sequence_method****
>
> *or*
>
> formal_argument_sequence.sequence_method****
>
> etc.****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,****
>
> Dmitry****
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.