[sv-ac] Draft2 review

Hi all,

I reviewed subclauses 16.13.15 - 16.15.5 of the draft and found the following issues:

In subclauses 16.9.11, 16.14.5, and 16.14.6 it is written:

To detect the end point, the triggered method may be applied to a named sequence instance, with or without arguments, or a formal argument of sequence type, where such is allowed, as follows:
sequence_instance.triggered
formal_argument_sequence.triggered

To detect the end point, the matched method may be applied to a named sequence instance, with or without arguments, or a formal argument of sequence type, where such is allowed, as follows:
sequence_instance.matched
formal_argument_sequence.matched

These methods are invoked using the following syntax:
sequence_instance.sequence_method
formal_argument_sequence.sequence_method

I think that in all these places it is better to add or between the syntax alternatives:
sequence_instance.sequence_method
or
formal_argument_sequence.sequence_method
etc.

Thanks,
Dmitry
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.