[sv-ac] RE: My notes regarding 2578

From: Little Scott-B11206 <B11206@freescale.com>
Date: Tue Aug 02 2011 - 11:47:49 PDT

Hi Dmitry, Ed:

My thought is that iff is probably okay.

I think that in an ideal world the vacuity of not(p1) or p2 would match that of p1 implies p2. Based on the previous discussions I don't believe we know of a consistent set of definitions where that relationship holds. I favor fixing the implies vacuity definition which I believe is badly broken. There are other warts in the definitions that will remain for the time being. When someone comes up with a consistent set of definitions that work consistently for all cases this section can then be overhauled.

Thanks,
Scott

From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of Eduard Cerny
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 12:40 PM
To: Korchemny, Dmitry; 'ben@systemverilog.us'
Cc: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: [sv-ac] RE: My notes regarding 2578

There is one more question: is there a need that vacuity of
not(p1) or p2
matches that of
p1 implies p2
?
thanks
ed

From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of Korchemny, Dmitry
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 1:37 PM
To: 'ben@systemverilog.us'
Cc: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: [sv-ac] My notes regarding 2578

Hi Ben,

I had the following question: should we modify the vacuity definition of iff? Probably we can leave it as is.

Thanks,
Dmitry
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue Aug 2 11:48:51 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Aug 02 2011 - 11:48:57 PDT