[sv-ac] RE: My notes regarding 2578

There is one more question: is there a need that vacuity of
not(p1) or p2
matches that of
p1 implies p2
?
thanks
ed

From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of Korchemny, Dmitry
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 1:37 PM
To: 'ben@systemverilog.us'
Cc: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: [sv-ac] My notes regarding 2578

Hi Ben,

I had the following question: should we modify the vacuity definition of iff? Probably we can leave it as is.

Thanks,
Dmitry
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.