Re: [sv-ac] Call to vote: Due June 20

Mantis 2412 __X__ Yes ____ No
Ben Cohen
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Thomas J Thatcher <
thomas.thatcher@oracle.com> wrote:

> -You have until 8:00 am PDT, Tuesday, June 28, 2011 to respond
> -An issue passes if there are zero NO votes and half of the eligible voters
> respond with a YES vote.
> -If you vote NO on any issue, your vote must be accompanied by a reason.
> The issue will then be up for discussion during a future conference call.
>
> As of the June 21, 2011 meeting, the eligible voters are
>
> Ashok Bhatt
> Laurence Bisht
> Eduard Cerny
> Ben Cohen
> Shaun Feng
> Tapan Kapoor
> Jacob Katz
> Scott Little
> Manisha Kulshrestha
> Anupam Prabhakar
> Samik Sengupta
> Tom Thatcher
>
>
> Mantis 2412 ____ Yes ____ No
> http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/**view.php?id=2412<http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/view.php?id=2412>
> http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/**file_download.php?file_id=**5164&type=bug<http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/file_download.php?file_id=5164&type=bug>
>
> The list of changes Anupam made to the proposal in response to Champions
> feedback is attached.
>
> Tom
>
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Prabhakar, Anupam" <anupam_prabhakar@mentor.com>
> To: "thomas.thatcher@oracle.com" <thomas.thatcher@oracle.com>, "Little
> Scott-B11206 (B11206@freescale.com)" <B11206@freescale.com>
> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:22:35 +0000
> Subject: Mantis 2412 changes
> Hi Tom/Scott,
>
> Shalom’s comment
>
> a) The proposal says, "If a sequence with a method is passed as an
> actual
> argument to a module instantiation, it shall be clocked as if it
> were
> instantiated at the place of module instantiation. The same rule
> shall
> apply if a sequence with a method is passed as an actual argument to
> an
> interface, program, function or task instantiation."
>
> Modules, interfaces, and programs don't have arguments, but rather
> ports.
>
> b) In the comment at the bottom of page 4,
>
> // e4 infers default clocking cb and not posedge clk_a as there are
> // more than one event control in this procedure (16.15.6)
>
> "there are" should be "there is".
>
>
> Tom, you can send these changes with the email ballot.
>
> Changed from
>
> If a sequence with a method is passed as an actual argument to a checker
> instantiation, it is substituted in place of the corresponding formal
> argument. Such a sequence shall be clocked as if it were instantiated inside
> the checker.
>
> If a sequence with a method is passed as an actual argument to a module
> instantiation, it shall be clocked as if it were instantiated at the place
> of module instantiation. The same rule shall apply if a sequence with a
> method is passed as an actual argument to an interface, program, function or
> task instantiation
>
> To
>
> If a sequence with a method is connected to a port of a checker
> instantiation, it is substituted in place of the corresponding formal
> argument. Such a sequence shall be clocked as if it were instantiated inside
> the checker.
>
> If a sequence with a method is connected to a port of a module
> instantiation, it shall be clocked as if it were instantiated at the place
> of module instantiation. The same rule shall apply if a sequence with a
> method is connected to a port of an interface or program instantiation or
> passed as an actual argument to a function or task call.
>
> And changed
>
> // e4 infers default clocking cb and not posedge clk_a as there are
>
> To
>
> // e4 infers default clocking cb and not posedge clk_a as there is
>
> Anupam
>
>
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.