[sv-ac] RE: mantis 3295

Hi Scott,

In FailOn/Off you state, " This task also affects the execution of the
default fail action block." I am confused by this clarification. Can
you explain why it is needed?

MK> The above clarification was added as default fail action is not
written by the user and it is implicitly added by the tool. So, we
wanted to clarify that the task is going to affect this implicit fail
action also. This language is from the previous version and at that time
some people thought it was necessary to add this clarification.

Thanks.
Manisha

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> Kulshrestha, Manisha
> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 4:55 AM
> To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
> Subject: [sv-ac] mantis 3295
>
> Hi,
>
> I have uploaded a new proposal with the following changes.
>
> 1. In 20.11, formatted list of arguments as list.
> 2. Changed the sentence "The $assertcontrol has different arguments as
> follows".
> 3. Added ',' before i.e. or e.g.
> 4. changed '==' to 'is equivalent to'
> 5. Added description of different arguments to each bullet for the
> argument and removed their description from the paragraph at the end.
> 6. Changed S_IMMEDIATE to SIMPLE_IMMEDIATE. Changed D_IMMEDIATE to
> DEFERRED_IMMEDIATE.
> 7. Changed 'system task $assertcontrol' to '$assertcontrol system
> task'.
> 8. Fixed the on/off/kill numbers from 2,3,4 to 3,4,5 in writing
> equivalents.
> 9. Fixed language at some other places based on Scott's comments.
>
> Please review and let me know if any change is required.
>
> Thanks.
> Manisha
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.