[sv-ac] RE: Mantis 3069

Hello Jacob,

I had a quick look at the new proposal, it looks OK. I have only one concern - backward compatibility. Since in the 2009 LRM the declaration can be anywhere and applies everywhere, unless the global clock is in the top module or unit, the behavior will change. Should there be perhaps a different keyword for the new global clock? E.g., hierarchical clocking ? Or local clocking?

Thanks,
ed

From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of Katz, Jacob
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 4:44 AM
To: sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: [sv-ac] Mantis 3069

Hi,
I've uploaded an updated proposal for 3069 (http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=3069), which contains more examples and changes to the lookup rules.
Please take a look...

Thanks.
--------------------------------
Jacob M. Katz | jacob.katz@intel.com<mailto:jacob.katz@intel.com> | Work: +972-4-865-5726 | iNet: (8)-465-5726

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.