Subject: RE: [sv-ac] Wrong spelling of goto operator in BNF (App A.)
From: David W. Smith (david.smith@synopsys.com)
Date: Mon Apr 21 2003 - 13:36:34 PDT
Taken care of in LRM-303 with confirmation by Surrendra.
Regards
David
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of Adam
Krolnik
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 9:57 AM
To: sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: [sv-ac] Wrong spelling of goto operator in BNF (App A.)
Good morning all.
Would someone concur of the wrong spelling of the goto operator as noted on
pages 174 (Syntax box 17-5). This matches our agreements and the text on
page 174.
Faisal, I recommend this change, provided there is agreement, to David
Smith.
Section A.2.10, pg 301.
WAS:
goto_repetition ::= [*> const_or_range_expression ]
MUST BE:
goto_repetition ::= [*-> const_or_range_expression ]
Section 17.7.2 pg 174.
WAS:
goto_repetition ::= [*> const_or_range_expression ]
MUST BE:
goto_repetition ::= [*-> const_or_range_expression ]
Adam Krolnik
Verification Mgr.
LSI Logic Corp.
Plano TX. 75074
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Apr 21 2003 - 13:34:29 PDT