Subject: Re: [sv-ac] delay/concatenation syntax
From: dudani@us04.synopsys.com
Date: Wed Feb 19 2003 - 19:36:09 PST
Hi Adam,
The reason why you need to type less is because it gets rid of all
parenthesis. The default, ";" without any [] following it, creates
syntactic ambiguities for the parser.
Surrendra
At 07:00 PM 2/19/2003 -0600, you wrote:
>Hi Surrendra;
>
>I'm confused.
>
>We aren't supposed to bring up syntax proposals. Only the DWG is supposed
>to be doing this...
>
>The disadvantage you present for your proposal is too great!
>
> >no default for concatenation with delay 1(;)
>
>So every time I have to write a sequence, I will be writing ";[1] ".
>
>I don't understand how this makes for less typing.
>
>If both the sequence separator and the implication operator both were
>nonoverlapping
>then you will have better consistency.
>
>I will take a look at the vfv pdf you made. Thanks.
>
>
> Adam Krolnik
> Verification Mgr.
> LSI Logic Corp.
> Plano TX. 75074
>
**********************************************
Surrendra A. Dudani
Synopsys, Inc.
377 Simarano Drive
Suite 300
Marlboro, MA 01752
Tel: 508-263-8072
Fax: 508-263-8123
email: dudani@synopsys.com
**********************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Feb 19 2003 - 19:36:53 PST