I vote in support - let’s close this issue. -- yaron On Jun 26, 2014, at 12:16 AM, darren.galpin@infineon.com wrote: > Hi, > > This is an e-mail ballot on http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=3386. The summary is as follows:- > > > Summary: Consider adding wildcard equality operators > Description: > Consider adding wildcard equiality operators ==? > and !=? like in SystemVerilog, where x and z values act as wildcard. > > > Comment from IEEE-SA ballot, to consider for future version. > ====================================================================== > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > (0016233) Yuri Tsoglin (developer) - 2014-06-25 08:42 > http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=3386#c16233 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > I propose to close this issue. > We already have operators === and !== (section 4.10.3 in the 2011 version of LRM), which provide this ability between HDL objects and e expressions. > > Applying the same to e expressions in general would be irrelevant. Unlike SystemVerilog (which is based on Verilog in the first place), e is not based on HDL language, and as such it doesn't have at all the notion of x and z values for its native expressions. > > In addition, we already have MVL capabilities for simple ports (sections > 9.9 and 9.10 in the 2011 version), which also handle x and z values in a way. > > > > > So, the ballot question is as follows:- > > Do you accept closing this issue as rejected on the basis that it applies to HDL languages only? > > > > The ballot will be open for a week. Feel free to add any points of discussion to the issue via the reflector. > > Cheers, > > Darren > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Darren Galpin Tel: +44 117 9528741 > Infineon Technologies Fax: +44 117 9528777 > Infineon House Darren.Galpin@infineon.com<mailto:Darren.Galpin@infineon.com> > Great Western Court > Hunts Ground Road > Stoke Gifford > Bristol, BS34 8HP, England > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Jun 26 15:33:44 2014
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jun 26 2014 - 15:33:47 PDT