Re: messages and message loggers

From: stefan birman <stefan@amiq.com>
Date: Thu Apr 24 2014 - 09:16:31 PDT
I agree.


On 24/02/20149 18:27, Greg White wrote:
>
> I agree
>
> -Greg White
>    sent from my Galaxy S3
>
> On Feb 24, 2014 1:29 AM, "Hannes Froehlich" <hannes@cadence.com 
> <mailto:hannes@cadence.com>> wrote:
>
>     Yes, I also agree 100%. The sooner we remove the old stuff, the
>     earlier users will switch.
>
>     *From:*owner-ieee1647@eda.org <mailto:owner-ieee1647@eda.org>
>     [mailto:owner-ieee1647@eda.org <mailto:owner-ieee1647@eda.org>]
>     *On Behalf Of *Alan Perlman
>     *Sent:* 16 February 2014 16:40
>     *To:* Yuri Tsoglin; ieee1647@eda.org <mailto:ieee1647@eda.org>
>     *Subject:* RE: messages and message loggers
>
>     I fully agree.
>
>     *From:*owner-ieee1647@eda.org <mailto:owner-ieee1647@eda.org>
>     [mailto:owner-ieee1647@eda.org] *On Behalf Of *Yuri Tsoglin
>     *Sent:* Sunday, February 16, 2014 6:27 PM
>     *To:* ieee1647@eda.org <mailto:ieee1647@eda.org>
>     *Subject:* messages and message loggers
>
>     Hi,
>
>     This is regarding Mantis issue 4377 - new message configuration
>     infrastructure.
>
>     I propose to completely remove the old -- logger based -- message
>     configuration API from the standard (including the removal of
>     "message logger" concept itself), and add the new -- unit based --
>     instead.
>
>     I see several reasons to do so, rather than having both old and
>     new API:
>
>     -The new API provides the same functionality, and even more.
>
>     -The new API is much simpler and easier to define. The old one has
>     several complicated aspects, and I doubt if they are all precisely
>     defined in the current version of the standard.
>
>     -Having both APIs in the standard would make it even more
>     complicated, without need.
>
>     oEspecially along with the addition of structured messages
>     material (another Mantis issue - 4312).
>
>     -Cadence might eventually stop supporting the old API -- it is
>     currently under deprecation process in Specman.
>
>     How does this sound?
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Yuri.
>
>     http://www.cadence.com/mail/footer_gray_640.gif
>
>     http://www.cadence.com/mail/footer_logocdns2.jpg
>
>     	
>
>     *Yuri Tsoglin*|/e/ Language team, Specman RnD
>
>     P: 972.3.9004305   F: 972.3.9004001 www.cadence.com
>     <http://www.cadence.com>
>
>     http://www.cadence.com/mail/footer_gray_640.gif
>
>
>     -- 
>     This message has been scanned for viruses and
>     dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>,
>     and is
>     believed to be clean.
>
>
>     -- 
>     This message has been scanned for viruses and
>     dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>,
>     and is
>     believed to be clean.
>
>
>     -- 
>     This message has been scanned for viruses and
>     dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>,
>     and is
>     believed to be clean.
>
>
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean. 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Thu Apr 24 09:37:20 2014

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Apr 24 2014 - 09:37:26 PDT