I agree -Greg White sent from my Galaxy S3 On Feb 24, 2014 1:29 AM, "Hannes Froehlich" <hannes@cadence.com> wrote: > Yes, I also agree 100%. The sooner we remove the old stuff, the earlier > users will switch. > > > > *From:* owner-ieee1647@eda.org [mailto:owner-ieee1647@eda.org] *On Behalf > Of *Alan Perlman > *Sent:* 16 February 2014 16:40 > *To:* Yuri Tsoglin; ieee1647@eda.org > *Subject:* RE: messages and message loggers > > > > I fully agree. > > > > *From:* owner-ieee1647@eda.org [mailto:owner-ieee1647@eda.org<owner-ieee1647@eda.org>] > *On Behalf Of *Yuri Tsoglin > *Sent:* Sunday, February 16, 2014 6:27 PM > *To:* ieee1647@eda.org > *Subject:* messages and message loggers > > > > Hi, > > > > This is regarding Mantis issue 4377 - new message configuration > infrastructure. > > > > I propose to completely remove the old - logger based - message > configuration API from the standard (including the removal of "message > logger" concept itself), and add the new - unit based - instead. > > I see several reasons to do so, rather than having both old and new API: > > - The new API provides the same functionality, and even more. > > - The new API is much simpler and easier to define. The old one > has several complicated aspects, and I doubt if they are all precisely > defined in the current version of the standard. > > - Having both APIs in the standard would make it even more > complicated, without need. > > o Especially along with the addition of structured messages material > (another Mantis issue - 4312). > > - Cadence might eventually stop supporting the old API - it is > currently under deprecation process in Specman. > > > > How does this sound? > > > > Thanks, > > Yuri. > > > > > > [image: http://www.cadence.com/mail/footer_gray_640.gif] > > [image: http://www.cadence.com/mail/footer_logocdns2.jpg] > > > > *Yuri Tsoglin* | *e* Language team, Specman RnD > > P: 972.3.9004305 F: 972.3.9004001 www.cadence.com > > > > [image: http://www.cadence.com/mail/footer_gray_640.gif] > > > > > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is > believed to be clean. > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is > believed to be clean. > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is > believed to be clean. > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 24 2014 - 08:28:13 PST