TWiki
>
P1800 Web
>
SystemVerilogAssertionCommittee
>
SVACMeetingMinutes
>
SV-AC_Minutes_2016_03_23
(2016-03-23,
ErikSeligman
)
(raw view)
E
dit
A
ttach
Attending: Manisha, Anupam, Ben, Ang Boon Chong, Mehbub Ali, Dennis Brophy, Ed Cerny, Erik Seligman (chaired mtg due to Dmitry's absence) * Reminder of IEEE patent policy - See: http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt * Minutes approval: Ben moved, Manisha second. All votes yes. * Email ballot results * Issues 4041, 5520, 5572 passed: 7y/0n/0a (AR- Dmitry- next steps) * 3672 failed: [[https://accellera.mantishub.com/view.php?id=3672]] * Ed- understand objections & able to fix? – Posted new version. * Manisha: What about unnamed assert containing named block? * Anupam: Treat like always case? * AR: Ed- find appropriate precedent in LRM (if any) & email group * Mantis 3117: [[https://accellera.mantishub.com/view.php?id=3117]] (Manisha)- status? * Shalom reviewed * AR: Dmitry – Call for vote * Mantis 5372: [[https://accellera.mantishub.com/view.php?id=5372]] (Erik)- meaning of tick * Definition a bit vague * Erik: define as time step in which clocking event occurs? * Ben: define as clocking event? * Manisha: how about any region after the clock event has happened? * AR (Erik): Attempt to wordsmith a definition & email to group for feedback * Mantis 4991: [[https://accellera.mantishub.com/view.php?id=4991]] (Erik) – ready to vote? * Ben reviewed * AR: Dmitry- call for vote * Mantis grading (5476, 5517, 5520, 5549, 5551) * [[https://accellera.mantishub.com/view.php?id=5476]] : AR – Dmitry- assign owner or editor * [[https://accellera.mantishub.com/view.php?id=5517]] : AR – Dmitry- assign owner or editor * [[https://accellera.mantishub.com/view.php?id=5520]] : AR – Manisha- review overlap with 3117, maybe close or incorporate * [[https://accellera.mantishub.com/view.php?id=5549]] : AR – Dmitry- assign owner or editor * [[https://accellera.mantishub.com/view.php?id=5551]] : * Ed- same rules as for implication? – Discussed last time: derived from suffix implication : maybe close or add one-line clarification * AR – Ed- review record & close or file proposal * Opens * Ben- have we addressed false vacuity in general? Need to address non-vacuity. Some discussion in 5548. Need good definition of non-vacuity, may simulators handle incorrectly. Probably not a change for this PAR, should probably document in Mantis & have longer discussion. (AR- Ben). -- %USERSIG{ErikSeligman - 2016-03-23}% ---++ Comments <br />%COMMENT%
E
dit
|
A
ttach
|
P
rint version
|
H
istory
: r1
|
B
acklinks
|
V
iew topic
|
Ra
w
edit
|
M
ore topic actions
Topic revision: r1 - 2016-03-23 - 17:55:47 -
ErikSeligman
P1800
Log In
or
Register
P1800 Web
Create New Topic
Index
Search
Changes
Notifications
Statistics
Preferences
Webs
Main
P1076
Ballots
LCS2016_080
P10761
P1647
P16661
P1685
P1734
P1735
P1778
P1800
P1801
Sandbox
TWiki
VIP
VerilogAMS
Copyright © 2008-2026 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki?
Send feedback