RE: [1076.1] Proposals for new features open for dicussion

I am not sure if any of you aware of this,
but there is a similar proposal on the
table in the Verilog-AMS group:

http://www.eda-stds.org/verilog-ams/htmlpages/public-docs/table_model_LRM_23_proposal_1.pdf

It would be nice if the two "table_models"
would be identical or very similar...  Any
suggestions on how to get the two groups
talking to each other?

Arpad
===========================================

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-vhdl-ams@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-vhdl-ams@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Alain Vachoux
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 2:19 AM
To: 1076.1 mailing list
Subject: [1076.1] Proposals for new features open for dicussion

Hi,

As mentioned in the minutes of the last working group meeting, a new 
page has been created on the P1076.1 web site at
http://www.eda-stds.org/vhdl-ams/wwwpages_new/new_features.html
which contains first drafts of proposals for new features in the 
VHDL-AMS language or new standard packages.

The page includes the definition of the process we'll follow and the 
definition of the form of proposals. It also currently lists three 
proposals in various degrees of achievement:
- Mixed Netlists
- Table Data Types and Lookup Functions
- Requirements and Verification

I highly encourage you to study these proposals, make comments and 
contribute to the proposals. The discussion can be done in the 1076.1 
mailing list vhdl-ams@vhdl.org and in the next working group meetings. 
Currently there is no deadline on when the discussion should stop and 
decisions have to be made in the working group.

If you have other suggestions for new features, please consider 
submitting me a document which is close to the form that is defined in 
the web page.

Best regards,
Alain Vachoux

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.