Folks, In IR1.99.05, the analysis includes: Perhaps it would have been better if the text (LRM 3.5.1, first paragraph), "A scalar nature definition defines a scalar nature, its branch types, and the name of its reference terminal." were modified to read: "A scalar nature definition defines a scalar nature and its branch types, and declares the name of the reference terminal which is of the nature." ...but it seems a minor point. The clarification is significant, in that is makes it clear that the reference terminal name is declared by a nature declaration. The ramification is that the reference terminal name has a scope and is visible. The rules for scope and visibility only apply to declarations. If the reference terminal name were not treated as a declaration, it would not have scope or visibility, and so could not be referred to by name. Cheers, PA -- Dr. Peter J. Ashenden peter@ashenden.com.au Ashenden Designs Pty. Ltd. www.ashenden.com.au PO Box 640 VoIP: 0871270078@sip.internode.on.net Stirling, SA 5152 Phone (mobile): +61 414 709 106 AustraliaReceived on Mon Apr 10 21:31:49 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 10 2006 - 21:33:31 PDT