Subject: Re: Request Clarification: Q'INTEG'DOT and Q'DOT'INTEG
From: Juergen Pfitzenmaier (pfitzen@web.de)
Date: Fri Jun 21 2002 - 07:40:10 PDT
Hello,
I'm sorry if you receive this email twice; the first try was rejected.
In my opinion this point is already made clear in the LRM. From LRM 14.1 we
have the following:
The prefix of Q'DOT and Q'INTEG is any quantity denoted by the static name Q.
A static name is according to LRM 6.1 only one of the following
- The name is a simple name or selected name ....
- The name is an indexed name ...
- The name is a slice name ...
An attribute name is therefore not a static name and Q'DOT'INTEG and Q'INTEG'DOT
are both not legal VHDL-AMS.
I hope this is helpful.
Jürgen Pfitzenmaier
______________________________________________________________________________
All inclusive! 100 MB Speicher, SMS 50% günstiger, 32 MB Attachment-Größe,
Preisvorteile und mehr unter http://club.web.de/?mc=021104
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 07:50:47 PDT