Re: [vhdl-200x-ft] Question on Type and Package Generics

Peter,
> While we could do similarly, we
> need to recognize the VHDL's protected types are closely aligned to class
> definitions in OO languages. There is a preference among WG members to
> develop OO features based on extending protected types rather than by
> following the Ada-95 approach.
I saw numerous public positive responses to the Suave OO extensions
to VHDL to the effect of if you put these in the language I would
use them right away.

With respect to using protected types for the basis of OO features,
the only public response I have seen supporting that was Steve Bailey.
Are you also leaning toward protected types?

Regards,
Jim

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jim Lewis
Director of Training             mailto:Jim@SynthWorks.com
SynthWorks Design Inc.           http://www.SynthWorks.com
1-503-590-4787
Expert VHDL Training for Hardware Design and Verification
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~