RE: [vhdl-200x-ft] Update to FT12: reading of out ports

From: Bailey, Stephen <SBailey@model.com>
Date: Mon Dec 20 2004 - 06:34:18 PST

Tristan & Peter,

I believe that Peter's comments in this email address only OUT mode
signal parameters to subprograms and not OUT mode ports. However, I do
want to verify that is true. For OUT mode ports, the value read should
be the driving value.

-Steve Bailey

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-vhdl-200x-ft@eda.org
> [mailto:owner-vhdl-200x-ft@eda.org] On Behalf Of tgingold@free.fr
> Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 6:00 AM
> To: Peter Ashenden
> Cc: vhdl-200x-ft@eda.org
> Subject: Re: [vhdl-200x-ft] Update to FT12: reading of out ports
>
> Selon Peter Ashenden <peter@ashenden.com.au>:
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > I had an action from the 16-Nov meeting to update FT12 (see
> attached).
> >
> > I've revised the description to specify reading an out-mode signal
> > parameter reads the effective value. This permits uniform
> treatment
> > of signal objects, specifically, that reading them reads
> the effective value.
> >
> > An omission that I've corrected is that, in order for a
> procedure to
> > read the effective value of the actual signal associated with an
> > out-mode signal parameter, the procedure needs to be passed a
> > reference to the signal. See the proposed changes to 2.1.1.2.
> >
> > My action item also called for me to update the proposal to allow
> > reading of out-mode variable parameters. However, that
> already appears to be in place.
> > Please let me know if I've overlooked something here. Thanks.
> It appears that note 5 of 12.6.2 should be modified too.
>
> I still wonder wether the value read of an out signal from a
> procedure is the same or not as the value read from the
> signal directly from the process.
> I don't think so...
>
> Tristan.
>
Received on Mon Dec 20 06:34:25 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Dec 20 2004 - 06:34:42 PST