RE: [vhdl-200x-ft] VHPI impact from FT proposals

I agree that we should incorporate VHPI impacts in the proposals.

-Steve Bailey

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-vhdl-200x-ft@eda.org
> [mailto:owner-vhdl-200x-ft@eda.org] On Behalf Of Peter Ashenden
> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 7:03 AM
> To: vhdl-200x-ft@eda.org
> Cc: vhpi-pilot@eda.org
> Subject: [vhdl-200x-ft] VHPI impact from FT proposals
>
> Dear colleages,
>
> Some of the FT proposals we've been reviewing affect the
> VHPI, mostly by requiring revision or extension of the
> imformation model. Since the current plan is to incorporate
> VHPI and the FT proposals as a single revision of the
> standard, we need to assess any VHPI impact and ensure VHPI
> revisions are included as part of FT proposals.
>
> May I suggest we do this before FT team ballot on approval of
> each proposal?
> I can go down the list of proposals to identify those affected.
>
> Comments? Thanks.
>
> Cheers,
>
> PA
>
> --
> Dr. Peter J. Ashenden peter@ashenden.com.au
> Ashenden Designs Pty. Ltd. www.ashenden.com.au
> PO Box 640 Ph: +61 8 8339 7532
> Stirling, SA 5152 Fax: +61 8 8339 2616
> Australia Mobile: +61 414 70 9106
>
>
>
Received on Wed Sep 22 06:11:48 2004