[vhdl-200x] RE: [vhdl-200x-ft] New types based on FT-14

Ryan,

Are there any specific types you think we should be considering for
inclusion in standard packages? If so, it might be appropriate to list them
for the next rev, since we've already got our hands pretty full for
vhdl-200x-ft. It always helps to have an idea of where you're going next so
you don't make adverse decisions now!

Cheers,

PA

--
Dr. Peter J. Ashenden                        peter@ashenden.com.au
Ashenden Designs Pty. Ltd.                   www.ashenden.com.au
PO Box 640                                   Ph:  +61 8 8339 7532
Stirling, SA 5152                            Fax: +61 8 8339 2616
Australia                                    Mobile: +61 414 70 9106
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-vhdl-200x-ft@eda.org 
> [mailto:owner-vhdl-200x-ft@eda.org] On Behalf Of Hinton, Ryan 
> W @ CSW-SLC
> Sent: Tuesday, 21 December 2004 10:41
> To: 'vhdl-200x-ft@eda.org'
> Cc: 'vhdl-200x@eda.org'
> Subject: [vhdl-200x-ft] New types based on FT-14
> 
> 
> All,
> 
> I anticipate the creation of a variety of new types using the 
> new flexibility provided by FT-14 (unconstrained elements in 
> arrays and records).  I can think of a few that I will define 
> as soon as I get the green light from our tools vendors.  Do 
> we want to define any types in anticipation of FT-14, or do 
> we want to wait and see which de-facto standards tools 
> vendors come up with that we can adopt?
> 
> ---
> Ryan Hinton
> L-3 Communications / Communication Systems - West 
> ryan.w.hinton@L-3com.com
>