Re: [sv-champions] Email vote ending October 2

Reminder, tomorrow is the last day for this email vote.

Neil

On 09/24/11 20:17, Neil Korpusik wrote:
> P1800 Champions,
>
> We are conducting an email vote for mantis items that are in the resolved
> state. There are 9 mantis items ready for the Champions. I have put all
> of them into this email vote. There are still some from the last email
> vote which some Champions requested additional time to review. I did not
> include those in this email vote. Those will come up for a vote again in
> the next email vote.
>
> Mark your votes as being either Approve or Oppose. If you Oppose, please
> specify a reason. You have until October 2, midnight (PST) to cast your
> votes.
>
> We are getting to the end of the timeline for this PAR, so the votes
> are coming closer together.
>
>
> Neil
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> P1800 Champions,
>
> We are conducting an email vote for mantis items that are in the
> resolved state. There are 9 mantis items ready for the Champions. I have
> put all of them into this email vote. There are still some from the last
> email vote which some Champions requested additional time to review. I
> did not include those in this email vote. Those will come up for a vote
> again in the next email vote.
>
> Mark your votes as being either Approve or Oppose. If you Oppose, please
> specify a reason. You have until October 2, midnight (PST) to cast your
> votes.
>
> We are getting to the end of the timeline for this PAR, so the votes are
> coming closer together.
>
> Neil
>
>
> 1. 1356 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=1356> SV-EC Multiple
> inheritance
> There is a proposal (11 pages)
> Unanimously approved in sv-ec September 12 2011 meeting.
> 1356_Interface_Classes_rev12.pdf
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 2. 2081 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2081> SV-BC Not clear
> enough which kinds of statements are prohibited in always_comb
> There is a proposal (1 page)
> On September 12, 2011 the SV-BC unanimously approved the attached
> proposal.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 3. 2547 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2547> SV-AC local
> variable read before write
> No change required
> Passed by voice vote 2011-08-16: 9y/0n/0a.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 4. 3015 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3015> SV-AC Examples of
> $fatal have bad arguments
> There is a proposal (1 page)
> The amended proposal passed by voice vote 2011-08-18: 9y/0n/0a.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 5. 3202 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3202> SV-AC Clarify on
> whether certain system functions are allowed in classes, 'let',
> and other corner cases
> Duplicate of 2476
> Approved by voice vote 2011-08-02: 7y/0n/0a.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 6. 3213 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3213> SV-AC Update
> definition of sampled value
> There is a proposal (11 pages)
> Amended proposal passed by email vote 2011-08-01: 8y/0n/0a.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 7. 3326 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3326> SV-BC LRM in BNF
> allows parameters declaration under generate, while in generate
> chapter it is forbidden
> There is a proposal (a 2-line change)
> On July 18, 2011 the SV-BC unanimously approved the attached
> proposal.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 8. 2289 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2289> SV-BC 6.20.1
> should say that generate block and compilation unit-scope
> parameters are local
> There is a proposal (a 2-line change)
> On July 18, 2011 the SV-BC unanimously approved the attached
> proposal.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 9. 2093 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2093> SV-AC Checker
> construct should permit output arguments
> There is a proposal (6 pages)
> Approved by voice vote 2011-09-20: 10y/0n/0a.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.