Re: [sv-champions] Email vote ending June 11, 2011

Reminder -- the email vote ends this Saturday.

Neil

On 05/31/11 11:25, Neil Korpusik wrote:
> P1800 Champions,
>
> We are conducting an email vote for mantis items that are in the resolved
> state. There are 37 mantis items ready for the Champions. I have put all
> 37 into this email vote. Most of these mantis items are for small
> changes or
> for no changes at all. Mantis 2506 is however a fairly large proposal.
>
> Mark your votes as being either Approve or Oppose. If you Oppose, please
> specify a reason. You have until June 11, 6pm (PST) to cast your votes.
>
>
> Neil
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> P1800 Champions,
>
> We are conducting an email vote for mantis items that are in the
> resolved state. There are 37 mantis items ready for the Champions. I
> have put all 37 into this email vote. Most of these mantis items are for
> small changes or for no changes at all. Mantis 2506 is however a fairly
> large proposal.
>
> Mark your votes as being either Approve or Oppose. If you Oppose, please
> specify a reason. You have until June 11, 6pm (PST) to cast your votes.
>
> Neil
>
>
> 1. 3254 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3254> Errata SV-EC
> 18.5.6 if-else constraints mistakenly uses the work "block" when
> it means "set"
> There is a proposal (2 words changed in one paragraph)
> Approved in email vote 5/11/2011. proposal: 3254_constraint_set.pdf
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 2. 2905 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2905> Errata SV-EC BNF
> bug for attribute instance along with timeunits_declaration
> There is a proposal (one change to the timeunits BNF)
> Approved in email vote 5/11/2011, proposal:
> 2905_attribute_timeunits.pdf
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 3. 2935 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2935> Errata SV-EC
> Correction to example in 9.7. in 1800-2009
> No change required - has already been fixed
> Approved by email vote, 5/11/2011. CLOSE as already fixed.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 4. 2463 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2463> Errata SV-BC
> 9.4.3: Description of repeat event control is in the wrong place
> No change required
> On May 23, 2011 by email vote the SV-BC unanimously agreed this
> issue was addressed in 1800-2009.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 5. 1214 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=1214> Errata SV-BC Why a
> separate package name space? (19.13)
> No change required
> On May 23, 2011 by email vote the SV-BC unanimously agreed this
> issue was addressed in 1800-2009.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 6. 2540 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2540> Clarificatio SV-BC
> Package and identifier "::" rules
> No change required
> On May 23, 2011 by email vote the SV-BC unanimously agreed this
> issue was addressed in 1800-2009.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 7. 2982 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2982> Errata SV-BC
> Keyword "rand" is used in example as variable ident - this should
> not compile
> There is a proposal - small changes to two examples - old 1364
> example that now conflicts with new SystemVerilog keywords.
>
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 8. 0245 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=0245> Clarification
> SV-EC Array of queues
> No change required
> SV-EC meeting April 11 2011: close mantis 245, as already
> implemented. One abstain vote from Gord: The summary says array of
> queues - not sure that what exists is as general as what was
> requested. Persistence of elements is a key point with this.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 9. 2985 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2985> Clarification
> SV-EC Multi-dimensional queues
> Duplicate of 245
> Unanimoulsy approved: April 11 2011
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 10. 3297 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3297> Errata SV-EC text
> 18.6.2 font size issue
> There is a proposal - font changes in several places
> Unanimously approved: sv-ec meeting April 11 2011 proposal:
> 3297_font_size.pdf
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 11. 3181 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3181> Errata SV-EC minor
> incorrect syntax in with clause in example in 18.5.7.2
> There is a proposal - changes one line of one example
> Unanimously approved: sv-ec meeting April 11 2011. proposal:
> 3181_with_parentheses.pdf
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 12. 2952 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2952> Errata SV-EC text
> Identifier case error in 25.9 virtual interface example
> There is a proposal - corrects several typos in one example
> Unanimously approved, sv-ec meeting April 11 2011.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 13. 3405 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3405> Errata SV-EC text
> Virtual interface example typos
> Duplicate of 2952
> SV-EC April 11 2011 meeting: Unanimously approved to close 3405
> mantis as duplicate of 2952.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 14. 2662 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2662> Clarification SV-B
> misleading pseudo-nonterminal name in escaped identifier
> production in Annex A
> There is a proposal - a one line bnf change
> On May 4, 2011 the SV-BC unanimously approved the attached
> proposal via email vote.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 15. 3216 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3216> Errata SV-BC minor
> 'simple_type' excerpt error
> There is a proposal - a one line bnf change
> On May 4, 2011 the SV-BC unanimously approved the attached
> proposal via email vote.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 16. 2901 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2901> Errata SV-BC minor
> var and type() in for_variable_declarations
> There is a proposal - another bnf change
> On May 4, 2011 the SV-BC unanimously approved the attached
> proposal via email vote.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 17. 3233 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3233> Errata SV-BC minor
> implicit wire declarations should occur in instantiations of
> programs/interfaces also
> There is a proposal - a one line change
> On May 4, 2011 the SV-BC unanimously approved the attached
> proposal via email vote.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 18. 2835 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2835> Errata SV-BC minor
> It should be legal to explicitly specify let arguments as untyped
> There is a proposal - one line bnf update
> On May 4, 2011 the SV-BC unanimously approved the attached
> proposal via email vote.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 19. 3151 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3151> Errata SV-BC minor
> Unnecessary variable declaration in factorial function (13.4.2)
> There is a proposal - one line change to an example
> On May 4, 2011 the SV-BC unanimously approved the attached
> proposal via email vote.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 20. 0696 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=0696> Enhancement SV-BC
> Ballot Feedback Issue 225: Add parameterized tasks and functions
> There is a proposal - adds a new sub-clause (2 pages)
> On October 25, 2010 the SV-BC unanimously approved the attached
> proposal.
> The proposal (rev6) was unanimously approved by the SV-EC in the
> February 14, 2011 conference call.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 21. 3491 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3491> Errata SV-AC
> trivial Incorrect local variable flow rule in F.5.4
> There is a proposal - it is hard to spot, but it adds one parenthesis
> Passed by email ballot 2011-04-25: 8y/1a/0n. Comment by Erik
> Seligman (abstained): I don't understand the formal semantics well
> enough to figure out if this is ultimately the desired expression,
> so I'll have to trust you guys!
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 22. 3384 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3384> Clarification
> SV-BC Clarifications on integer data type signing
> There is a proposal - correction in a few spots concerning
> 'unsigned'.
> During its April 25 meeting, 2011 the SV-BC unanimously approved
> the attached proposal.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 23. 3026 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3026> Errata SV-BC text
> Mess with $rewind and $frewind
> There is a proposal - a couple of changes from $frewind to $rewind.
> On April 20, 2011 the SV-BC unanimously approved by email vote the
> attached proposal.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 24. 3362 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3362> Errata SV-BC text
> "literal string" should be "string literal" - two more
> There is a proposal - changes "literal string" to "string literal"
> On April 20, 2011 the SV-BC unanimously approved by email vote the
> attached proposal.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 25. 3274 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3274> Errata SV-BC text
> 'shortreal' should be bold
> There is a proposal - changes two keywords to being bold.
> On April 20, 2011 the SV-BC unanimously approved by email vote the
> attached proposal.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 26. 3062 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3062> Errata SV-BC minor
> Extra space in %t example
> There is a proposal - removes whitespace from several lines of a
> file-format example
> On April 20, 2011 the SV-BC unanimously approved by email vote the
> attached proposal.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 27. 2977 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2977> Errata SV-BC text
> [EDITORIAL ISSSUE] Wrong characters used in LRM example for array
> literal
> There is a proposal - fixes the font used for a "tick" in 1'b1
> On April 20, 2011 the SV-BC unanimously approved by email vote the
> attached proposal.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 28. 2976 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2976> Errata SV-BC text
> wrong xref at end of configurations clause
> There is a proposal - changes a cross-reference
> On April 20, 2011 the SV-BC unanimously approved by email vote the
> attached proposal.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 29. 2595 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2595> Errata SV-BC text
> protect pragma is also standard
> There is a proposal - adds one sentence to the "Standard pragmas"
> sub-clause. It now references the "protect" pragma.
> On April 20, 2011 the SV-BC unanimously approved by email vote the
> attached proposal.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 30. 2271 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2271> Errata SV-AC minor
> sequence events require a clocked sequence
> Duplicate
> Approved by voice vote 2011-04-12: 8y/0n/0a. This issue is covered
> by 2412.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 31. 3423 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3423> Errata SV-CC minor
> No way in VPI to trace instance-array connections across
> named-connections and dot-star connections
> There is a proposal - adds a few paragraphs to 37.11 Instance arrays
> On Mar-30-2011, the SV-CC PASSED this proposal (unanimous)
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 32. 2929 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2929> Errata SV-BC minor
> ref_declaration should use list_of_variable_port_identifiers
> There is a proposal - One-line bnf change
> On December 3, 2010 the SV-BC unanimously approved the attached
> proposal.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 33. 2395 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2395> Errata SV-BC minor
> Incorrect note attached to net_port_type production
> There is a proposal - removes note 15 from the bnf.
> On December 3, 2010 the SV-BC unanimously approved the attached
> proposal.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 34. 1106 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=1106> Errata SV-BC minor
> procedural assign to nonconstant part select and force of
> nonconstant bit-select
> No change required
> On December 3, 2010 the SV-BC unanimously approved to resolve this
> issue with no change because it was already addressed.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 35. 2889 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2889> Errata SV-BC minor
> .named_port(expression) in ANSI-style port declaration list should
> reset properties
> There is a proposal - adds a few new paragraphs
> On January 28, 2011 the SV-BC concluded an email vote that
> unanimously approved the attached proposal.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 36. 2506 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2506> Enhancement SV-EC
> Non-trivial coverage space shapes and joint conditions are
> difficult to specify with covergroups
> There is a proposal - this is a large proposal (17 pages)
> Proposal for 2506 is approved on 5/23/2011 with one Absain
> [Steven: does not know in detail about the topic]
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 37. 3385 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3385> Errata SV-AC
> Possible ambiguity when deferred assertion action block calls
> nested function
> There is a proposal (2 pages)
> Approved by voice vote 2011-05-17: 19y/0n/0a.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.