RE: [sv-champions] Email vote - Ending September 22nd mantis 251

The description of 251 says,

"For cross coverage, the syntax in table 20-4 does not allow multiple bins to be created for user defined bins, i.e. using the [] notation with the binsof construct. So the only way to track the crosses separately is through automatically created bins. Was there any specific reason for not allowing that. The syntax should be enhanced to allow multiple bins being created for user defined bins. The example in Section 20.5.1 should also be suitably enhanced."

That looks to me exactly like a "suggested direction".

Shalom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rich, Dave [mailto:Dave_Rich@mentor.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 7:54 AM
> To: Bresticker, Shalom; neil.korpusik@oracle.com; sv-champions@eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-champions] Email vote - Ending September 22nd mantis
> 251
>
> 251 is more of a dissatisfaction of the current semantics of crosses
> without a suggested direction. If nothing else, mantis 2506 has a
> loose
> proposal that should alleviate the concerns raised by 251.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com]
> > Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 7:35 AM
> > To: Rich, Dave; neil.korpusik@oracle.com; sv-champions@eda.org
> > Subject: RE: [sv-champions] Email vote - Ending September 22nd
> >
> > Dave,
> > How does the proposal of Mantis 2506 address Mantis 251?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.