RE: [sv-champions] Email vote ending May 27, 2009

Shalom,

Have you reviewed the response from Amit? This seems to be the
questionable item from the last champions e-mail vote.

http://www.eda-stds.org/sv-cc/hm/4168.html

I think it addresses your concerns. Since you abstained, I am going to
recommend that all items from the last email vote be approved unless I
hear otherwise.

Dave


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-champions@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-
> champions@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 6:27 AM
> To: Neil.Korpusik@Sun.COM; sv-champions@eda.org; 'Havlicek John'
> Subject: RE: [sv-champions] Email vote ending May 27, 2009
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Regarding the following issue,
> 
> 2.04 2636  SV-CC Ballot comment #145            contradiction for
return
> value of imported tasks
> 
> I don't see how the proposal fixes the problem.
> 
> 35.2.1 says, "Imported tasks always return a void value and thus can
only be
> used in statement context."
> 35.5.4 says, "Imported tasks always return an int result as part of
the DPI
> disable protocol and, thus, are declared in foreign code as int
functions
> (see 35.8 and 35.9)."
> 
> At best, this is confusing.
> 
> Shalom
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
> 
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
> 
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.