Neil, I approve all the issues with the following abstentions: Mantis 2638 - I did not have time to understand it well enough, though it appears OK Mantis 2636 - I sent a question about this previously. Mantis 2635 - I don't understand this well enough. Mantis 2572 - I want to verify that the allocation of numbers 658-660 does not conflict with their use on page 1198 for #define vpiMulticlockSequenceExpr 658 #define vpiClockedSeq 659 #define vpiPropertyInst 660 and that 700-702 do not conflict with their use on page 1199 for #define vpiActual 700 #define vpiTypedefAlias 701 #define vpiIndexTypespec 702 Regards, Shalom --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed May 27 08:24:07 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed May 27 2009 - 08:24:13 PDT